Toolglasses, Marking Menus, and Hotkeys: A Comparison of One and Two-Handed Command Selection Techniques

نویسندگان

  • Daniel L. Odell
  • Richard C. Davis
  • Andrew Smith
  • Paul K. Wright
چکیده

Research has shown that bimanual (two-handed) interfaces often provide more intuitive, efficient, and comfortable interaction than one-handed interfaces. This paper introduces a new input technique, bimanual marking menus, and compares its performance with five other techniques: static toolbars, hotkeys, grouped hotkeys, marking menus, and toolglasses. The study builds on previous work by setting the comparison in a commonly encountered task, shape drawing. In this context, grouped hotkeys and bimanual marking menus were found to be the fastest. Subjectively, the most preferred input method was bimanual marking menus. Toolglass performance was unexpectedly slow, which hints at the importance of low-level toolglass implementation choices.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On Merging Command Selection and Direct Manipulation

We present the results of a study comparing the relative benefits of three command selection techniques that merge command selection and direct manipulation: one twohanded technique, Toolglass [2], and two one-handed techniques, control menus [15] and FlowMenu [6]. Our results show that control menus and FlowMenu are significantly faster than Toolglass. Further analysis suggests that merging co...

متن کامل

Some Articulatory and Cognitive Aspects of "marking Menus": an Empirical Study

We describe "marking menus", an extension of "pie menus" which makes . Pie menus are circular menus subdivided into sectors, each of which might correspond to a different command. Marking menus are pie menus in which the path of the cursor leaves an ink trail. Thus, selecting a sector from a marking menu creates a visual mark similar to a pen stroke on paper. Marking menus are also unique in th...

متن کامل

An Empirical Evaluation of Some Articulatory and Cognitive Aspects of Marking Menus

We describe "marking menus", an extension of "pie menus" which makes . Pie menus are circular menus subdivided into sectors, each of which might correspond to a different command. Marking menus are pie menus in which the path of the cursor leaves an ink trail. Thus, selecting a sector from a marking menu creates a visual mark similar to a pen stroke on paper. Marking menus are also unique in th...

متن کامل

The Design and Evaluation of Marking Menus

This research focuses on the use of hand drawn marks as a human-computer input technique. Drawing a mark is an efficient command input technique in many situations. However, marks are not intrinsically self-explanatory as are other interactive techniques such as buttons and menus. This research develops and evaluates an interaction technique called marking menus which integrates menus and marks...

متن کامل

Extending Marking Menus with Integral Dimensions : Application to the Dartboard Menu

Marking menus have many benefits, including fast selection time, low error rate and fast transition to expert mode, but these are mitigated by a practical limit of 8 items per menu. Adding hierarchical levels increases capacity, but at the expense of longer selection times and higher error rates. In this paper we introduce Extended Marking Menus, a variant of marking menus that increases their ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004